Highlights

President Donald Trump has driven deep changes to U.S. immigration in his first year, but courts, Congress, and state and local resistance have blocked the most ambitious aims.

  • Interior immigration arrests rose 42 percent and interior removals rose 37 percent between January and September 2017, with enforcement priorities expanded to include unauthorized immigrants with no criminal records. 
  • The administration set the fiscal year (FY) 2018 refugee ceiling at 45,000—the lowest since the program began in 1980—and terminated Temporary Protected Status for nationals of six countries. 
  • New vetting requirements have slowed legal immigration: the adjudication rate for nonimmediate relative applications fell from 22 percent in FY 2016 to 9 percent  the following year after mandatory in-person interviews were added for green-card applicants. 
  • Courts halted family separation and early travel bans, Congress has not funded the border wall, and growing numbers of jurisdictions limit cooperation with ICE. 

U.S. immigration policy has undergone a sea change since the inauguration of Donald Trump in January 2017. Although his public statements have largely focused on a few major objectives toward which he has made only limited headway—such as building a wall along the entirety of the U.S.-Mexico border—the administration has taken other steps to redefine U.S. immigration policies that are less visible but no less important.

This report examines the wide range of changes the Trump administration has set in motion, from enhanced enforcement measures and new application vetting requirements, to cuts in refugee admissions and the scaling back of temporary protections for some noncitizens.

Despite the attention Trump has dedicated to immigration matters, this analysis finds that the fragmented nature of the U.S. political system has made it difficult for his administration to pursue some of its most ambitious aims. Congress has thus far shown little inclination to pass major immigration legislation, and the courts have halted or slowed key initiatives, including early iterations of the travel ban and the separation of families as part of a “zero-tolerance” border policy. States and localities have also taken divergent approaches to local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration authorities, with some passing laws to curtail coordination and others to facilitate it. Still, through incremental changes and presidential discretion, the administration may in the long term be able to significantly redefine who comes to the country and who is removed from it.

Table of Contents

I. Introduction

II. What Has Changed

A. Enhancing Immigration Enforcement

B. Cutting Back on Humanitarian Programs

C. Increasing Vetting and Obstacles for Legal Immigration

D. Ending DACA

III. The Impact of Expectations and Anxiety

IV. Congressional Inaction and Resistance

V. Pushback from Local and State Governments

VI. The Role of the Courts

VII. Conclusion

About the Transatlantic Council on Migration

Through rigorous research, high-level convenings, and tailored policy advice, the Council provides policymakers with essential analysis and cutting-edge policy recommendations to help tackle the most vexing policy questions.

About the U.S. Immigration Policy Program

The U.S. Immigration Policy Program provides analysis of U.S. immigration pathways, the impacts of enforcement and other policies, and the characteristics of immigrant populations.

About the Global Program

The Global Program bridges policy advice, research, and candid dialogue to design effective migration policies, drawing on global evidence and anticipating the forces reshaping how people move.