Highlights

Global displacement has outpaced traditional durable solutions such as resettlement. Legal labour, education, and family channels offer underutilised paths to refugee self-sufficiency.

  • The three traditional durable solutions—resettlement, repatriation, and local integration—are insufficient at the current scale of global displacement, making expansion of legal migration channels through labour, education, and family reunion imperative. 
  • Although refugees are technically eligible for many existing legal migration channels, practical, technical, and political obstacles routinely block access, requiring governments and international organisations to actively open and adapt these pathways. 
  • Private sponsorship by individuals, local groups, or faith-based organisations can reduce state costs, accelerate integration, and bring new actors and financing into the international protection regime. 
  • Innovative use of regional free-movement provisions offers an alternative legal pathway for refugees in countries where traditional protection is politically sensitive. 

The global refugee crisis has become increasingly complex as, for most of the displaced, the circumstances of their displacement severely constrain opportunities to move beyond the confines of refugee status. It is increasingly clear that the traditional approaches to addressing these issues—the "durable solutions" of resettlement, repatriation, and local integration—are insufficient to overcome the vast scale of need. The exploration of other legal opportunities whether in first-asylum countries or via migration elsewhere is imperative, as is the prudent and strategic investment to make them viable and accessible for refugees.

Legal channels for migration and mobility fall within three broad streams: labor, education, and family reunion. Although in theory refugees are already eligible to move through many of these channels, in reality pathways are often blocked by practical, technical, and political obstacles.

This report explains how governments, international organizations, and other actors can support refugees’ paths to self-sufficiency and stability by ensuring the accessibility of existing opportunities as well as creating new ones. Private sponsorship of refugees by individuals, local groups, or faith-based organizations, for example, can bring down costs to the state and accelerate integration outcomes, and has the potential to involve brand-new actors (and sources of finance) in the international protection regime. The innovative use of existing legislation geared towards the mobility of member state nationals under regional cooperation frameworks, meanwhile, offers an alternative approach in countries where traditional protection might be politically sensitive.

Table of Contents

I. Introduction

II. New and Existing Migration and Mobility Channels

A. Labor Migration

B. Education and Study Channels

C. Family Reunion

III. Secure Status in First-Asylum Countries: A Gateway to Mobility?

A. Facilitating Mobility

B. Access to Legal Stay

IV. Cross-Cutting Pathways

A. Private Sponsorhip

B. Regional Mobility

V. Strategic Approach

A. Framing and Coherence

B. Programming

VI. Conclusion

About the Moving Europe Beyond Crisis Project

As the systems designed to process migration flows to Europe buckled in 2015-16, this project offered new ideas to manage mixed flows and create sustainable long-term solutions for refugees.

About the Global Program

The Global Program bridges policy advice, research, and candid dialogue to design effective migration policies, drawing on global evidence and anticipating the forces reshaping how people move.