![]() |
![]() |
|
|
MPI Home
Online Journal Register for Updates Update Your Profile |
A new study commissioned by the American Bar Association concludes that significant Department of Justice procedural changes to the Board of Immigration Appeals in 2002 have had profound negative consequences. The study, conducted pro bono by the law firm Dorsey and Whitney LLP, asserts that in an attempt to clear immigration backlogs, the quality and transparency of BIA decisions have been compromised. Based on the study, an ABA Commission follow-up report suggests immediate reform. The study shows that effects of the procedural reforms include: insufficient time granted for board members to consider the arguments of each immigration case or the merit of an appeal, a drop in appeals granted from one in four cases to one in ten; and a tripling of the rate at which BIA decisions are appealed at the federal level-from 5 percent in 2001 to 15 percent in 2002. Legal experts from Dorsey and Whitney LLP and the ABA will discuss the study's findings as well as policy recommendations, which include discarding the 2002 changes.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2003 Migration Policy Institute. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy 1400 16th St NW, Ste 300 | Washington, DC 20036 | ph. 202-266-1940 | fax. 202-266-1900 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||