E.g., 07/01/2016
E.g., 07/01/2016

Understanding the Potential Impact of Executive Action on Immigration Enforcement

Reports
July 2015

Understanding the Potential Impact of Executive Action on Immigration Enforcement

While much of the attention to the Obama administration's announcement of executive actions on immigration in November 2014 has focused on key deferred action programs, two changes that have not faced legal challenge are in the process of being implemented and may substantially affect the U.S. immigration enforcement system. These changes include the adoption by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of new policy guidance on which categories of unauthorized immigrants and other potentially removable noncitizens are priorities for enforcement, and the replacement of the controversial Secure Communities information-sharing program with a new, more tailored Priority Enforcement Program (PEP). 

The new policy guidance, which builds on previous memoranda published by the Obama administration in 2010 and 2011, further targets enforcement to noncitizens who have been convicted of serious crimes, are threats to public safety, are recent illegal entrants, or have violated recent deportation orders. MPI estimates that about 13 percent of unauthorized immigrants in the United States would be considered enforcement priorities under these policies, compared to 27 percent under the 2010-11 enforcement guidelines. The net effect of this new guidance will likely be a reduction in deportations from within the interior of the United States as DHS detention and deportation resources are increasingly allocated to more explicitly defined priorities.

By comparing the new enforcement priorities to earlier DHS removal data, this report estimates that the 2014 policy guidance, if strictly adhered to, is likely to reduce deportations from within the United States by about 25,000 cases annually—bringing interior removals below the 100,000 mark. Removals at the U.S.-Mexico border remain a top priority under the 2014 guidelines, so falling interior removals may be offset to some extent by increases at the border.

Taking the enforcement focus off settled unauthorized immigrants who do not meet the November 2014 enforcement priorities would effectively offer a degree of protection to the vast majority—87 percent—of unauthorized immigrants now residing in the United States, thus affecting a substantially larger share of this population than the announced deferred action programs (9.6 million compared to as many as 5.2 million unauthorized immigrants).

This report analyzes how many unauthorized immigrants fall within each of the new priority categories and how implementation of these priorities could affect the number of deportations from the United States, as well as what the termination of Secure Communities and launch of PEP could mean for federal cooperation with state and local authorities on immigration.

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction

II. DHS Enforcement Priorities and Prosecutorial Discretion

A. The History of Prosecutorial Discretion in Immigration Enforcement

B. The 2014 Changes to Enforcement Priorities

III. Projected Impact of the 2014 Changes to Enforcement

A. Estimated Numbers of Priority and Nonpriority Cases

B. Projected Effects of Revised Enforcement Priorities on Removals

C. Characteristics of Noncitizens Potentially Benefiting from Prosecutorial Discretion under New Guidelines

D. Policy Implementation and Prosecutorial Discretion

IV. Termination and Replacement of the Secure Communities Program

A. The History of Secure Communities

B. The Priority Enforcement Program

V. Projected Impact of the Change to the Priority Enforcement Program

VI. Conclusion

Appendices: Explanation of Estimates

Appendix 1. Estimates of the Priority Status of Resident Unauthorized Population

Appendix 2. Assignment of Priority Status to Previous Deportees